They've got trouble down in the Big Easy.
 |
| From the place that brought you this stellar city planning |
There just isn't enough money to run the city's Public Defenders Office for the cases being processed. A few numbers that bear this out (most from the PBS link below):
- The PD budget was reduced 33% in last four years
- Some PD's are being asked to ride herd on 75-120 cases simultaneously
- There is a hiring freeze on PD's - if one leaves, he/she is not replaced
- Attorney count has gone from 78 to 42 with some of the most experienced/most productive lawyers leaving
- There has been a reduction in investigators from 15 to 8 (from whence actual evidence frequently comes)
- The PD Office began refusing cases starting in January 2016
It's gotten to the point that one judge felt citizens were being denied their Constitutional rights to a "speedy and public trial" (there's no arguing that, but his choice of defendants to set free may have been more of a motivational tool...). Even our friends in the UK thought this newsworthy:
There are other major financial challenges in New Orleans, especially with hard hits from the recession and a large tax cut in 2008, as well as a massive reduction in oil revenues. Also, the Public Defenders Office is not high on any politician's priority list.
Sources of funding for the PD:
- Court fees - poor clients and those that are convicted aren't paying anyways
- State funding - not popular; not getting more
- Traffic tickets and fines - the biggest portion, but apparently not big enough...
So here's what I propose (actually it was the spousal unit's idea - she figures she's under enough pressure at work already):
Well, not exactly.
More of a Revenue Generating / Conscience Clearer for local commuters akin to the TSA Precheck for qualifying airline travelers.
Eligible commuters driving in the county would be offered the chance to pay, say $100, every year for the privilege of driving much like they always have but WITHOUT the ever-present specter of being stopped by police, assessed a fine and accruing points against their license. Wouldn't that just take a little of the tension away from your morning and evening rides?
Yes, there's room for abuse, on both sides. But with some well thought out rules, and appealing pricing, it could work. For instance:
- To qualify, drivers would need a spotless record for at least three years
- It would only be effective against charges of speeding, not reckless driving or DUI/DWI
- Drivers would get three strikes, after which they're out of the program
The police would know these drivers are not the road menaces they are most worried about. Yes, they might even let some minor violations go - as they do now using their best judgment (or recognition of your PBA sticker).
Sure, sure, it creates a virtual class system on the road, but at least those people would actually be getting something for once again "paying their fair share." And it would provide some serious steady cash to the PD Office that serves the poor, indigent population (you can almost hear the violins).
Hey, it's better than having arrested murderers and rapists walking out the door.
 |
| Or on the road |
-------------------------------------
Really decent report on the crisis: